feat: add gpt-5.2-codex model#623
Merged
rekram1-node merged 2 commits intoanomalyco:devfrom Jan 14, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
since it isnt available via api it doesnt mae sense to add here rn |
Contributor
Author
|
@rekram1-node But OpenCode has just supported Codex's OAuth authentication. If we don't add it, how can we use this model in this mode? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
OpenAI’s official Codex CLI ships
gpt-5.2-codexas a first-class model preset (seemodel_presets.rs) and uses it as the default ChatGPT/Codex model (seemanager.rs). However, models.dev currently lacks this model entry.Change
providers/openai/models/gpt-5.2-codex.tomlgpt-5.2(context window, pricing, knowledge date, etc.)Notes
gpt-5.2-codexis markedsupported_in_api: false, so this appears to be a Codex/ChatGPT channel model rather than a public API-key model. If the fields should differ, I’m happy to adjust.Verification
bun validate